Anonymous or public feedback? Advantages and disadvantages
Giving effective feedback is vital within a team. However, when the time comes, the same question always arises: anonymous or public? Both options have their advocates and detractors, which is why we want to help you choose the most suitable model for your company.
The anonymous feedback is the most frequent Within a company, it allows employees to express their opinion freely without fear of being judged or getting into trouble. The main advantages of this model are:
It is true, however, that this model also has its disadvantages. Sometimes, anonymity favours the unconstructive criticism and underdeveloped, which will not allow you to obtain information of interest. Moreover, you will never be able to turn to the person to explain their arguments in more depth.
On the other hand, you can also opt for transparency and promote named feedback, where the individual knows who they are receiving comments from. Although still not very common, more and more companies are choosing to implement this option, which also offers many benefits:
To operate this model you can:
These techniques will make the task of extending feedback with attribution easier within your company. Even so, You'll have to face the typical fears que implica un proceso de feedback: ser juzgados, reprendidos, señalados, etc.
Which model do you think best suits your team Do you think you are capable of starting to sign your feedback with your name?